After a few re-runs and some tweaking to settings I managed to score myself a modest The performance these two GPUs offered not only in today’s games but in other highly anticipated titles was beyond respectable. You can see this below: Kepler GeForce I used RivaTuner V2. You can see all this in detail from the Hexus NVidia review sample seen here.

Uploader: Gorn
Date Added: 12 September 2011
File Size: 69.67 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 80558
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

But the actual scored achieved was very impressive indeed.

Everything went smoothly during the next boot and I immediately set my resolution to xx32 with 85hz refresh rate. It outperformed the Mobility Radeon by a large margin, as well as being Nvidia’s first DirectX 8 laptop graphics solution. The two new models were the MXX, which was clocked slightly faster than the original MX, and the MXSE, which had a narrower memory bus, and was intended as a replacement of sorts for the MX At the time of their introduction, Nvidia’s main products were the entry-level GeForce 2 MXthe midrange GeForce4 MX models released the same time as the Ti and Tiand the older but still high-performance GeForce 3 demoted to the upper mid-range or performance niche.

Although the was initially supposed to be part of the launch of the GeForce4 line, Nvidia had delayed its release gg4 sell off the soon-to-be discontinued GeForce 3 chips. For overclocking I believe it to be pure luck if you find a good one or not.


Sign up now Username Password Remember Me.

The GeForce 4 Ti enjoyed considerable longevity compared to its higher-clocked peers. Click to find out more. This is why we see such a huge improvement at the top end of the scale. Obviously there is some discrepancy between the results.

eVGA e-GeForce4 Ti4600 graphics card – GF4 Ti 4600 – 128 MB Series

Comparison of Nvidia graphics processing units. Retrieved April 12, This page was last edited on 10 Octoberat The display settings were exactly the same as the GeForce3 accept for the addition of the nView menu.

And while we praised the GeForce3 on a technological level we never recommended buying it as enjoyable DX8 games were gd4 months that turned into years away from its release. The score attained wasthis is breaking the 10k barrier and then some. Using third party drivers can, among other things, invalidate warranties.

Creative 3D Blaster 4 Titanium graphics card – GF4 Ti – MB Overview – CNET

Retrieved January 2, Retrieved May 15, The difference could be because of many different factors, the major two being the motherboard and the driver version. All three families were announced in early ; members within each family were differentiated by core and memory clock speeds. You can see the complete bundle below: In this real world benchmark the GeForce4 Ti series of card is setting new standards and breaking old records.


By reading this site you agree to our cookie policy. This benchmark is newer than each of the others and not quite as well known. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. It will be put up against Visiontek’s Ti graphics card and the Gainward Golden Sample Ti both of them at stock clock speeds.

Review: ABIT Geforce 4 TI – Graphics –

Tesla GeForce 8 9 First x then x and then finally x Conclusion Obviously the performance of this card is nothing less the stunning. When ATI launched its Radeon Pro in September 46600, it performed about the same as the MX, but had crucial advantages with better single-texturing performance and proper support of DirectX 8 shaders.

It was very similar to its predecessor; the main differences were higher core and memory clock rates, a revised memory controller known as Lightspeed Memory Architecture IIupdated pixel shaders with new instructions for Direct3D 8. tl

Despite harsh criticism by gaming enthusiasts, the GeForce4 MX was a market success. MadOnion did a good job with this benchmark and this is t reason it has become one of the most popular benchmarking tools.